Comparisons · register

How tectm compares

You already run something. These pages say what that thing is for and where cost control on the contract sits next to it, written so that “keep using it” is a possible conclusion, because on most jobs it is the right one. There is no feature table: counting ticks rewards whoever wrote the rows.

VS-01
tectm vs Procore
Procore manages the project and its documents. tectm answers whether the project is making money right now. If you already run Procore, tectm sits across it rather than replacing it.
VS-02
tectm vs Payapps
Payapps is built around the claim exchange itself. tectm is built around the cost position that produces the claim, so the claim is an output rather than the product.
VS-03
tectm vs MS Project and Primavera
Your program is a P&L in disguise. MS Project and Primavera draw the bars without knowing what anything costs. tectm's program is cost-loaded and tied to the budget, so a slip on the critical path is a margin number that day.

Compliance platforms like Hammertech and accounting systems like Xero and MYOB sit somewhere else again: they check the site and book the invoice respectively, and neither connects a docket to a budget line to a margin number. Native finance integration is on the roadmap.

Try it on your own contract.

tectm is invitation-only. We set up each account by hand.